Search
Searching can be done via the mode 'simple search' (one field) or extensive via 'advanced search' (multiple fields). For example, you can search for a combination of an author name, a year and a document type.
Basket
Useful results can be checked and added to a basket. The content of this can be exported or printed (to e.g. PDF).
RSS
You want to stay informed about newly added publications within your area of interest? This can be done by creating an RSS feed (?) of your search query.
new search
Geochemical fingerprinting of continental and oceanic basalts: a machine learning approach
In: Earth-Science Reviews. Elsevier: Amsterdam; Lausanne; London; New York; Oxford; Shannon. ISSN 0012-8252; e-ISSN 1872-6828
|  |
| Keyword |
|
| Author keywords |
Basalts; Fingerprinting; Machine learning; Paleogeography |
| Authors | | Top |
- Doucet, L.S.
- Tetley, M.G.
- Li, Z.X.
|
- Liu, Y.B.
- Gamaleldien, H.
|
|
| Abstract |
Basalts are ubiquitous, mantle-derived mafic rocks found within all tectonic settings. Studying the chemical composition of basalts has proven to be an effective way to understand tectonics-related mantle processes for more recent periods of Earth history when other geological and tectonic records are still well preserved. How-ever, using basalt geochemistry to decipher ancient tectonic environments and mantle processes on Earth re-mains a significant challenge; interpretations are often non-unique, and weathering, erosion, and orogenic processes can modify the chemical composition of basalts, and eliminate or obscure other complementary geotectonic records. This is most apparent in the oceanic realm, where subduction-related processes have erased much of the geological record for times older than-200 Ma, only leaving small and rare dismembered blocks of oceanic lithosphere as ophiolite me ' langes along tectonic sutures. As a result, workers must rely heavily on analyzing the chemical composition of preserved basalts to identify the tectonic settings of their original melt extraction from the mantle using various tectonic discrimination diagrams from the literature (e.g., Pearce and Cann, 1973). In this paper, we demonstrate that such widely used classic discrimination diagram approaches often suffer from the intrinsic shortfall of large ambiguity. Instead, we apply here a big-data approach to characterize basalts generated in some typical tectonic settings. We start with a bespoke data correction and machine learning workflow. Our results show that mid-ocean ridge basalts, ocean island basalts, continental flood basalts, arc basalts (from both the oceanic and continental realm), and oceanic flood basalts are statistically chemically different, thus presenting a novel and unique chemical 'fingerprinting' approach to more accurately discriminate basalts. The method successfully predicts the tectonic settings of basalt emplacement at a prediction accuracy of >96%. |
IMIS is developed and hosted by VLIZ.
