Zoeken
Zoeken kan via de modus 'eenvoudig zoeken' (één veld) of uitgebreid via 'geavanceerd zoeken' (meerdere velden). Zo kan je bv. zoeken op een combinatie van een auteursnaam (auteur), een jaartal (jaar) en een documenttype.
Boekenmand
Nuttige resultaten kan je aanvinken en toevoegen aan een mandje. De inhoud hiervan kan je exporteren of afdrukken (naar bv. PDF).
RSS
Op de hoogte blijven van nieuw toegevoegde publicaties binnen uw interessegebied? Dit kan door een RSS-feed (?) te maken van jouw zoekopdracht.
nieuwe zoekopdracht
Environmental impact mitigation and bi-culture: a comparative legal analysis of flexibility within European legal regimes - biofilter deployment
White, H.; Glenn, H. (2006). Environmental impact mitigation and bi-culture: a comparative legal analysis of flexibility within European legal regimes - biofilter deployment. Aquacult. Int. 14(3): 297-317. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10499-005-9035-9
In: Aquaculture International. Springer: London. ISSN 0967-6120; e-ISSN 1573-143X
|  |
| Trefwoorden |
Aquaculture techniques > Polyculture
Environmental impact
Filters > Biofilters
Marien/Kust |
| Author keywords |
biofilter; comparative law; environmental impact mitigation;polyculture; technological innovation |
| Abstract |
This paper investigates the potential flexibility within the current legal frameworks governing marine aquaculture across Europe to cater for the installation and management of marine biofilters alongside fish farms. The basis for debate is that deployment of these biofilters could be used to facilitate environmental impact mitigation. Furthermore, they have the potential to facilitate the development of bi-culture or polyculture through the harvesting of species from the biofilters themselves, for example, mussels (Mytilus edulis). This study explores the flexibility within and suitability of the current legal systems within Europe to cater for the specific technology’s adoption and management. The challenges identified from the legislative and policy frameworks are discussed along with the applicability of these to the use of biofilters for the development of bi-culture. Penultimately, recommendations are made as to where additional measures are needed and the challenges and difficulties that such measures will need to overcome before biofilters can be applied for environmental impact mitigation. Finally, the paper illustrates an application of ‘Comparative Legal Analysis’, demonstrating links to the question in hand and through so doing to wider coastal issues. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
