Zoeken
Zoeken kan via de modus 'eenvoudig zoeken' (één veld) of uitgebreid via 'geavanceerd zoeken' (meerdere velden). Zo kan je bv. zoeken op een combinatie van een auteursnaam (auteur), een jaartal (jaar) en een documenttype.
Boekenmand
Nuttige resultaten kan je aanvinken en toevoegen aan een mandje. De inhoud hiervan kan je exporteren of afdrukken (naar bv. PDF).
RSS
Op de hoogte blijven van nieuw toegevoegde publicaties binnen uw interessegebied? Dit kan door een RSS-feed (?) te maken van jouw zoekopdracht.
nieuwe zoekopdracht
Diverging strategies to planning an ecologically coherent network of MPAs in the North Sea: the roles of advocacy, evidence and pragmatism in the face of uncertainty
Caveen, A.J.; Fitzsimmons, C.; Pieraccini, M.; Dunn, E.; Sweeting, C.J.; Johnson, M.L.; Bloomfield, H.; Jones, E.V.; Lightfoot, P.; Gray, T.S.; Stead, S.M.; Polunin, N.V.C. (2014). Diverging strategies to planning an ecologically coherent network of MPAs in the North Sea: the roles of advocacy, evidence and pragmatism in the face of uncertainty, in: Johnson, M.L. et al. Adv. Mar. Biol. 69: Marine managed areas and fisheries. Advances in Marine Biology, 69: pp. 325-370. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800214-8.00009-8
In: Johnson, M.L.; Sandell, J. (Ed.) (2014). Adv. Mar. Biol. 69: Marine managed areas and fisheries. Advances in Marine Biology, 69. Academic Press: London. ISBN 978-0-12-800214-8. XXIX, 416 pp.
In: Advances in Marine Biology. Academic Press: London, New York. ISSN 0065-2881; e-ISSN 2162-5875
|  |
| Trefwoorden |
ANE, North Sea
Consultation
Habitat
Planning
Noordzee [Marine Regions]
Marien/Kust |
| Author keywords |
Network; Natura 2000; MCZ |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Caveen, A.J.
- Fitzsimmons, C.
- Pieraccini, M.
- Dunn, E.
|
- Sweeting, C.J.
- Johnson, M.L.
- Bloomfield, H.
- Jones, E.V.
|
- Lightfoot, P.
- Gray, T.S.
- Stead, S.M.
- Polunin, N.V.C.
|
| Abstract |
The North Sea is one of the most economically important seas in the world due to productive fisheries, extensive oil and gas fields, busy shipping routes, marine renewable energy development and recreational activity. Unsurprisingly, therefore, the use of marine protected areas (here defined widely to include fisheries closed areas and no-take marine reserves) in its management has generated considerable controversy—particularly with regards to the design of a regional ecologically coherent MPA network to meet international obligations.Drawing on three MPA processes currently occurring in the UK North Sea, we examine the real-world problems that make the designation of MPA networks challenging. The political problems include: disagreement among (and within) sectors over policy objectives and priorities, common access to fisheries resources at the EU level increasing the scale at which decisions have to be made and lack of an integrated strategy for implementing protected areas in the North Sea. The scientific problems include the patchy knowledge of benthic assemblages, limited knowledge of fishing gear–habitat interactions, and the increased risk of unforeseen externalities if human activity (predominantly fishing) is displaced from newly protected sites. Diverging stakeholder attitudes to these problems means that there is no consensus on what ecological coherence actually means.Ultimately, we caution against ‘quick-fix’ solutions that are based on advocacy and targets, as they create confusion and undermine trust in the planning process. We argue for a more pragmatic approach to marine protection that embraces the complexity of the social and political arena in which decisions are made. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
