Zoeken
Zoeken kan via de modus 'eenvoudig zoeken' (één veld) of uitgebreid via 'geavanceerd zoeken' (meerdere velden). Zo kan je bv. zoeken op een combinatie van een auteursnaam (auteur), een jaartal (jaar) en een documenttype.
Boekenmand
Nuttige resultaten kan je aanvinken en toevoegen aan een mandje. De inhoud hiervan kan je exporteren of afdrukken (naar bv. PDF).
RSS
Op de hoogte blijven van nieuw toegevoegde publicaties binnen uw interessegebied? Dit kan door een RSS-feed (?) te maken van jouw zoekopdracht.
nieuwe zoekopdracht
Comparing policy routes for low-carbon power technology deployment in EU an energy system analysis
Simoes, S.; Nijs, W.; Ruiz, P.; Sgobbi, A.; Thiel, C. (2017). Comparing policy routes for low-carbon power technology deployment in EU an energy system analysis. Energy policy 101: 353-365. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.006
In: Energy Policy. Elsevier: Guildford. ISSN 0301-4215; e-ISSN 1873-6777
|   |
| Author keywords |
Power sector; Low-carbon; Energy system model; TIMES; EU28; Energytechnology policy |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Simoes, S.
- Nijs, W.
- Ruiz, P.
|
|
|
| Abstract |
The optimization energy system model JRC-EU-TIMES is used to support energy technology R&D design by analysing power technologies deployment till 2050 and their sensitivity to different decarbonisation exogenous policy routes. The policy routes are based on the decarbonised scenarios of the EU Energy Roadmap 2050 combining energy efficiency, renewables, nuclear or carbon capture and storage (CCS). A "reference and seven decarbonised scenarios are modelled for EU28. We conclude on the importance of policy decisions for the configuration of the low carbon power sector, especially on nuclear acceptance and available sites for new RES plants. Differently from typical analysis focussing on technology portfolio for each route, we analyse the deployment of each technology across policy routes, for optimising technology R & D. R & D priority should be given to those less-policy-sensitive technologies that are in any case deployed rapidly across the modelled time horizon (e.g. PV), but also to those deployed up to their technical potentials and typically less sensitive to exogenous policy routes. For these 'no regret' technologies (e.g. geothermal), R & D efforts should focus on increasing their technical potential. For possibly cost-effective technologies very sensitive to the policy routes (e.g. CSP and marine), R & D efforts should be directed to improving their techno-economic performance. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
