Zoeken
Zoeken kan via de modus 'eenvoudig zoeken' (één veld) of uitgebreid via 'geavanceerd zoeken' (meerdere velden). Zo kan je bv. zoeken op een combinatie van een auteursnaam (auteur), een jaartal (jaar) en een documenttype.
Boekenmand
Nuttige resultaten kan je aanvinken en toevoegen aan een mandje. De inhoud hiervan kan je exporteren of afdrukken (naar bv. PDF).
RSS
Op de hoogte blijven van nieuw toegevoegde publicaties binnen uw interessegebied? Dit kan door een RSS-feed (?) te maken van jouw zoekopdracht.
nieuwe zoekopdracht
Reproductive isolation in Prokelisia planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae): Acoustic differentiation and hybridization failure
Heady, S.E.; Denno, R.F. (1991). Reproductive isolation in Prokelisia planthoppers (Homoptera: Delphacidae): Acoustic differentiation and hybridization failure. J. Insect Behav. 4(3): 367-390. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01048284
In: Journal of Insect Behavior. Plenum: New York. ISSN 0892-7553; e-ISSN 1572-8889
|  |
| Trefwoorden |
Delphacidae Leach, 1815 [WoRMS]; Prokelisia dolus; Prokelisia marginata (Van Duzee, 1897) [WoRMS]
|
| Author keywords |
Prokelisia dolus; acoustic signals; reproductive isolation; courtship wing; dimorphism |
| Abstract |
Males and females of Prokelisia marginata (Van Duzee) and Prokelisia dolusWilson communicate through substrate-transmitted vibrations. The acoustic signals (attraction and courtship calls) of these planthoppers are effective in mate location, attraction, and mate choice. Attraction calls are structurally distinct for both species and differ in pulse type, pulse repetition rate, and pulse duration. Using playback of prerecorded calls, individuals discriminated between conspecific and heterospecific signals. Depending on the sex and species, response calls were produced three to eight times more frequently to conspecifics than to heterospecifics. However, acoustic signals alone did not explain reproductive isolation and hybridization failure in these two congeners. Some heterospecific pairs called, courted, and attempted to join genitalia, but no connections were successful and no progeny were produced. Thus, acoustic behavior is not a guaranteed premating isolating mechanism in no-choice situations. Other courtship behaviors and possibly morphological differences in genitalia also contributed to their isolation. Females displayed a variety of rejection behaviors to conspecific and heterospecific males, suggesting that sexual selection (female choice), in addition to species recognition, may be an important force in the evolution of the acoustic signals of planthoppers. Although signal structure was not dependent on wing form (planthoppers exhibit wing dimorphism), the age when females first began to call was related to wing form. Brachypterous (flightless) females of both species began calling early in adult life (day 2), whereas macropterous (migratory) females began calling later in adult life (day 6). This pattern is consistent with the oogenesis-flight syndrome, in which reproductive maturity is delayed until after migration occurs. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
