Zoeken
Zoeken kan via de modus 'eenvoudig zoeken' (één veld) of uitgebreid via 'geavanceerd zoeken' (meerdere velden). Zo kan je bv. zoeken op een combinatie van een auteursnaam (auteur), een jaartal (jaar) en een documenttype.
Boekenmand
Nuttige resultaten kan je aanvinken en toevoegen aan een mandje. De inhoud hiervan kan je exporteren of afdrukken (naar bv. PDF).
RSS
Op de hoogte blijven van nieuw toegevoegde publicaties binnen uw interessegebied? Dit kan door een RSS-feed (?) te maken van jouw zoekopdracht.
nieuwe zoekopdracht
Endangered species recovery: A resource allocation problem
Gerber, L.R.; Runge, M.C.; Maloney, R.F.; Iacona, G.D.; Drew, C.A.; Avery-Gomm, S.; Brazill-Boast, J.; Crouse, D.T.; Epanchin-Niell, R.S.; Hall, S.B.; Maguire, L.A.; Male, T.; Morgan, D.; Newman, J.; Possingham, H.P.; Rumpff, L.; Weiss, K.C.B.; Wilson, R.S.; Zablan, M.A. (2018). Endangered species recovery: A resource allocation problem. Science (Wash.) 362(6412): 284-286. https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8434
In: Science (Washington). American Association for the Advancement of Science: New York, N.Y. ISSN 0036-8075; e-ISSN 1095-9203, meer
|  |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Gerber, L.R.
- Runge, M.C.
- Maloney, R.F.
- Iacona, G.D.
- Drew, C.A.
- Avery-Gomm, S.
- Brazill-Boast, J.
|
- Crouse, D.T.
- Epanchin-Niell, R.S.
- Hall, S.B.
- Maguire, L.A.
- Male, T.
- Morgan, D.
|
- Newman, J.
- Possingham, H.P.
- Rumpff, L.
- Weiss, K.C.B.
- Wilson, R.S.
- Zablan, M.A.
|
| Abstract |
Many nations have laws to identify and protect imperiled species and their ecosystems. In the United States, actions taken under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) have prevented many extinctions, but few listed species have recovered to the point where they can have the ESA protections removed (1, 2). One reason for this [among many (3)] is a shortfall in funding, raising a conundrum for agencies responsible for species recovery: Should resources be allocated toward species facing imminent extinction or species whose long-term survival can most benefit from investment? Some argue that the latter strategy is ethically unsound because it may abandon species with little hope of long-term recovery [for example, (4)], even when science suggests that the former strategy may miss opportunities to prevent species from ever experiencing the risk of imminent extinction (2). We suggest that framing recovery prioritization as a resource allocation problem provides a structure to facilitate constructive debate about such important questions. We discuss here the merits of an explicit resource allocation framework and introduce a prototype decision tool [(5); see supplementary materials for details] that we developed with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to facilitate transparent and efficient recovery allocation decisions. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
