nieuwe zoekopdracht

[ meld een fout in dit record ]mandje (0): toevoegen | toon Print deze pagina

‘In apparent disagreement with all law of nations in the world’: Negotiating neutrality for shipping and trade during the French revolutionary and Napoleonic wars
Marzagalli, S.; Müller, L. (2016). ‘In apparent disagreement with all law of nations in the world’: Negotiating neutrality for shipping and trade during the French revolutionary and Napoleonic wars. Int .J. Marit. Hist. 28(1): 108-117. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0843871415624167
In: International Journal of Maritime History. Maritime Studies Research Unit: St. John's. ISSN 0843-8714; e-ISSN 2052-7756
Peer reviewed article  

Beschikbaar in  Auteurs 

Trefwoorden
    18th century
    19th century
Author keywords
    Denmark, French Revolutionary Wars, neutral rights, neutrality, shipping, Sweden, the United States

Auteurs  Top 
  • Marzagalli, S.
  • Müller, L.

Abstract
    This Forum deals with maritime trade and shipping conducted by three neutral maritime states in the French Revolutionary Wars: Sweden, Denmark and the United States. The five contributions, based on specific cases of neutral shipping, illustrate the complementarity of neutral and belligerent trade and shipping, and so the significance of neutrality for the continuity of commerce in wartime. The introduction discusseseighteenth-century concepts of neutrality, as neutrals and belligerents understood it. Moreover, it provides a background narrative of the French Revolutionary Wars from the perspective of these three neutral states.

Alle informatie in het Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) valt onder het VLIZ Privacy beleid Top | Auteurs 
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.