Zoeken
Zoeken kan via de modus 'eenvoudig zoeken' (één veld) of uitgebreid via 'geavanceerd zoeken' (meerdere velden). Zo kan je bv. zoeken op een combinatie van een auteursnaam (auteur), een jaartal (jaar) en een documenttype.
Boekenmand
Nuttige resultaten kan je aanvinken en toevoegen aan een mandje. De inhoud hiervan kan je exporteren of afdrukken (naar bv. PDF).
RSS
Op de hoogte blijven van nieuw toegevoegde publicaties binnen uw interessegebied? Dit kan door een RSS-feed (?) te maken van jouw zoekopdracht.
nieuwe zoekopdracht
International cooperation and coordination in the Global Legislation of High Seas ABMTs including MPAs: Taking OSPAR practice as reference
Tang, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Y. (2021). International cooperation and coordination in the Global Legislation of High Seas ABMTs including MPAs: Taking OSPAR practice as reference. Mar. Policy 133: 104767. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104767
In: Marine Policy. Elsevier: UK. ISSN 0308-597X; e-ISSN 1872-9460
|  |
| Author keywords |
High Seas ABMTs including MPAs; Cooperation and coordination; OSPAR; BBNJ |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Tang, Y.
- Chen, W.
- Zhang, Y.
|
|
|
| Abstract |
In the negotiation of the new Agreement on the conservation and sustainable use of marine Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ), how to resolve potential overlaps, inconsistencies and conflicts between the new Agreement and relevant global, sectoral and regional instruments, framework and bodies (IFBs) on the issues about Area-Based Management Tools (ABMTs) including Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in ABNJ, is a key matter on the table. To explore how establishing high seas ABMTs including MPAs via the BBNJ might work in practice, this paper selects the practice of OSPAR and NEAFC as an example of regional cooperation. It finds that in the absence of top-down authority, this regional cooperation cannot fill the functional and geographical gaps, or harmonize different instruments relating to establishing and managing the High Seas ABMTs including MPAs. It then examines the challenges under a centralized global structure proposed in BBNJ negotiation, and proposes a practical global structure for cooperation and coordination. It suggests that a global decision-making body and their subordinates under the BBNJ may be empowered with different authorities under different scenarios. They may act as "cooperation initiator" and “conflict coordinator” of the ABMTs including MPAs where there is relevant IFBs, achieving objectives by coordinating with existing mechanisms; or act as “gap filler” by directly establishing and managing ABMTs including MPAs where there is no IFBs. This decision-making body should be empowered to develop general objectives and indicative criteria for the identification of areas, establish or designate ABMTs including MPAs, and strengthen monitoring and review. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
