Zoeken
Zoeken kan via de modus 'eenvoudig zoeken' (één veld) of uitgebreid via 'geavanceerd zoeken' (meerdere velden). Zo kan je bv. zoeken op een combinatie van een auteursnaam (auteur), een jaartal (jaar) en een documenttype.
Boekenmand
Nuttige resultaten kan je aanvinken en toevoegen aan een mandje. De inhoud hiervan kan je exporteren of afdrukken (naar bv. PDF).
RSS
Op de hoogte blijven van nieuw toegevoegde publicaties binnen uw interessegebied? Dit kan door een RSS-feed (?) te maken van jouw zoekopdracht.
nieuwe zoekopdracht
Action research in tropical tuna purse seine fisheries: Thoughts and perspectives
Airaud, M.; Tezenas, L.; Moreno, G.; Dagorn, L.; Murua, J. (2020). Action research in tropical tuna purse seine fisheries: Thoughts and perspectives, in: Holm, P. et al. Collaborative research in fisheries: Co-creating knowledge for fisheries governance in Europe. MARE Publication Series, 22: pp. 193-212. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26784-1_12
In: Holm, P. et al. (2020). Collaborative research in fisheries: Co-creating knowledge for fisheries governance in Europe. MARE Publication Series, 22. Springer: Cham. ISBN 978-3-030-26783-4. XXIII, 320 pp. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26784-1
In: MARE Publication Series. Amsterdam University Press/Springer: Amsterdam. ISSN 2212-6260; e-ISSN 2212-6279
|  |
| Trefwoord |
Fisheries > Finfish fisheries > Tuna fisheries
|
| Author keywords |
Fish aggregating devices (FADs), Participatory governance, Collaborative research, Action research |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Airaud, M.
- Tezenas, L.
- Moreno, G.
|
|
|
| Abstract |
The French-Spanish GAP case study is part of a more general movement that aims to link science and technology with democratic and participatory fisheries governance. The stated objective is to ‘bring stakeholders involved in tuna fishing together so that they can jointly formulate proposals for the sustainable management of FADs’. In order to promote such collective functioning, a research project was initiated. As part of it, multi-profession meetings were held and a survey conducted. Taking various points of view into account resulted in reflections on how best to design and carry out activities, as well as how to go about doing action research. From the field, it became clear that a greater flow of knowledge and understanding between different actors is important and necessary. When this happens, action research will bring forth more updated information about actors’ stakes and interests, as well as their positions in the systems of relations. Collective formulations can be produced and reflective stances taken. This participatory process has raised questions regarding the relationship between actors, how they function, and the implications for knowledge mobilisation. It is difficult for an action research project to be timebound like other projects. Rather, action research projects need to be tried and tested at variable densities and rhythms. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
