Zoeken
Zoeken kan via de modus 'eenvoudig zoeken' (één veld) of uitgebreid via 'geavanceerd zoeken' (meerdere velden). Zo kan je bv. zoeken op een combinatie van een auteursnaam (auteur), een jaartal (jaar) en een documenttype.
Boekenmand
Nuttige resultaten kan je aanvinken en toevoegen aan een mandje. De inhoud hiervan kan je exporteren of afdrukken (naar bv. PDF).
RSS
Op de hoogte blijven van nieuw toegevoegde publicaties binnen uw interessegebied? Dit kan door een RSS-feed (?) te maken van jouw zoekopdracht.
nieuwe zoekopdracht
Valuating natural resources and ecosystem services: systematic review of methods in use
Ignatyeva, M.; Yurak, V.; Dushin, A. (2022). Valuating natural resources and ecosystem services: systematic review of methods in use. Sustainability 14(3): 1901. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14031901
In: Sustainability. MDPI: Basel. ISSN 2071-1050; e-ISSN 2071-1050
|   |
| Author keywords |
economic valuation; evaluation ((e)valuating process); ecosystem services; natural resources; evaluation method; evaluation approach; classifications |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Ignatyeva, M.
- Yurak, V.
- Dushin, A.
|
|
|
| Abstract |
The relevance of an ecosystem approach, which involves addressing ecosystems as an object of research, economically evaluating ecosystem services, and including the existing variety of evaluation methods and their classifications for the estimation of nature’s value, was the focus of this study. So, the aim of the current research is to develop an evaluation theory by refining approaches and methods for the economic evaluation of natural resources and ecosystem services. The research object was the evaluation practice of the former USSR, Russia, and countries outside Russia. Employing research methods of systematization and content analysis with evolutionary and ecosystem approaches, about three hundred scientific papers have been the subject of this review. The study (1) reveals the evolutionary changes in economic evaluation approaches and methods of natural resources and ecosystem services; (2) discloses the features of the existing classifications of economic evaluation methods; and (3) offers the author’s classification, which is based on the five classification criteria: evaluation type, evaluation approaches, evaluation character (nature), evaluation methods, and market discourse. We believe that understanding the development of scientific thought about evaluation methods and their classifications will make it possible to increase the reliability of the estimation results in natural resource and environmental economics. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
