Catalogus

Zoeken

Zoeken kan via de modus 'eenvoudig zoeken' (één veld) of uitgebreid via 'geavanceerd zoeken' (meerdere velden). Zo kan je bv. zoeken op een combinatie van een auteursnaam (auteur), een jaartal (jaar) en een documenttype.

Boekenmand

Nuttige resultaten kan je aanvinken en toevoegen aan een mandje. De inhoud hiervan kan je exporteren of afdrukken (naar bv. PDF).

RSS

Op de hoogte blijven van nieuw toegevoegde publicaties binnen uw interessegebied? Dit kan door een RSS-feed (?) te maken van jouw zoekopdracht.

log in

Publicaties | Kaarten

nieuwe zoekopdracht

[ meld een fout in dit record ]

mandje (0): toevoegen | toon

---

How new science should affect the application of protection measures for UK estuarine shorebirds Goss-Custard, J.D.; Stillman, R.A. (2020). How new science should affect the application of protection measures for UK estuarine shorebirds, in: Humphreys, J. et al. Marine protected areas: Science, policy and management. pp. 525-542. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102698-4.00027-7 In: Humphreys, J.; Clark, R.W.E. (Ed.) (2020). Marine protected areas: Science, policy and management. Elsevier: Amsterdam. ISBN 978-0-08-102698-4. xxi, 792 pp. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/c2017-0-02525-9

---

Beschikbaar in	Auteurs
VLIZ: Non-open access 376722 [ aanvragen ]

---

Trefwoorden

ANE, British Isles, England, Devon, Exe Estuary Aves [WoRMS]; Haematopus ostralegus Linnaeus, 1758 [WoRMS] Exe Estuary [Marine Regions] Marien/Kust; Brak water

Author keywords

Shorebirds; Special protection areas; Disturbance; Habitat loss; Habituation; Mitigation; Eurasian oystercatcher; Individual based model

---

Auteurs		Top
Goss-Custard, J.D. Stillman, R.A.

---

Abstract

Using data primarily from the Exe estuary in Devon, England, we argue that the current regulations for UK Special Protection Areas fail to take into account a number of important realities about the attributes of estuaries that influence the ability of a site to support the number of shorebirds for which the site was designated. We argue that the effect of these omissions, and the ways in which the regulations have been implemented, has been to exaggerate the impact on the birds that many proposals, if carried out, would actually have. This leads to skepticism, even cynicism, in the minds of an unconvinced public that has been affected by decisions based on arguments they see as inconsistent with experience and common sense. The main omissions in the regulations are: (i) to consider the attributes of habitat quality and extent, disturbance and predation individually rather than considering their combined, net contribution to ensuring the favourable status of the site; (ii) to ignore completely the attribute of the time available for foraging, and (iii) to not allow for birds to habituate to the presence of people.

---

Alle informatie in het Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) valt onder het VLIZ Privacy beleid

Top | Auteurs