nieuwe zoekopdracht

[ meld een fout in dit record ]mandje (0): toevoegen | toon Print deze pagina

Techno-economic aspects of different process approaches based on brown macroalgae feedstock: a step toward commercialization of seaweed-based biorefineries
Nazemi, F.; Karimi, K.; Denayer, J.F.M.; Shafiei, M. (2021). Techno-economic aspects of different process approaches based on brown macroalgae feedstock: a step toward commercialization of seaweed-based biorefineries. Algal Research 58: 102366. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102366
In: Algal Research. Elsevier: Amsterdam. ISSN 2211-9264
Peer reviewed article  

Beschikbaar in  Auteurs 

Trefwoorden
    Seaweed
    Marien/Kust
Author keywords
    Aspen Plus (R); Biofuel; Biorefinery; Process simulation; Seaweed; Techno-economic analysis

Auteurs  Top 
  • Nazemi, F.
  • Karimi, K.
  • Denayer, J.F.M.
  • Shafiei, M.

Abstract
    Brown macroalgae, so called seaweed, has shown promising potential to produce biofuel and biobased chemicals. However, a single-product biorefinery producing biofuel from seaweed at an industrial scale has many economic obstacles, hindering its commercialization. In the present contribution, a model-based process analysis was performed in which (1) the main economic barriers of an only-fuel approach were studied extensively, (2) an innovative biorefinery approach was applied to remove the economic impediments and pave the way to the commercialization of a seaweed-based biorefinery. Nizimuddinia zanardini, a natural and widely available brown macroalga in Iran, was chosen as the plant's feedstock. In the only-fuel approach, the seaweed was used to produce fuel ethanol and electricity exclusively. In the biorefinery approach, an integrated process was applied to produce fuel ethanol, electricity, and high-value chemicals, i.e., mannitol, alginate, and protein. Simulations were conducted by Aspen Plus®, and the results were employed to perform an economic analysis. Considering the internal rate of return of 20% for the plant location, the profitability indices of both process frameworks were calculated. Based on the profitability indices, the only-fuel approach was economically unviable, mainly due to the low conversion rate of ethanol from seaweed carbohydrates. On the other hand, the biorefinery approach was cost-effective, having produced highly valuable chemicals. Therefore, it is much more lucrative to produce high-value chemicals besides biofuel than to exclusively produce biofuel from seaweed feedstock. The maximum allowable dry seaweed price (MDSP) was −64 and 374 US$ per ton of dry seaweed for the only-fuel and biorefinery approaches, respectively. MDSP of the biorefinery approach can be used to set a benchmark price for future studies on seaweed cultivation.

Alle informatie in het Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) valt onder het VLIZ Privacy beleid Top | Auteurs 
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.