Catalogus

Zoeken

Zoeken kan via de modus 'eenvoudig zoeken' (één veld) of uitgebreid via 'geavanceerd zoeken' (meerdere velden). Zo kan je bv. zoeken op een combinatie van een auteursnaam (auteur), een jaartal (jaar) en een documenttype.

Boekenmand

Nuttige resultaten kan je aanvinken en toevoegen aan een mandje. De inhoud hiervan kan je exporteren of afdrukken (naar bv. PDF).

RSS

Op de hoogte blijven van nieuw toegevoegde publicaties binnen uw interessegebied? Dit kan door een RSS-feed (?) te maken van jouw zoekopdracht.

log in

Publicaties | Kaarten

nieuwe zoekopdracht

[ meld een fout in dit record ]

mandje (0): toevoegen | toon

---

Intermediate ecosystem services: the origin and meanings behind an unsettled concept Lamothe, K.A.; Sutherland, I.J. (2018). Intermediate ecosystem services: the origin and meanings behind an unsettled concept. Int.J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosys. Serv. Manag. 14(1): 179-187. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2018.1524399 In: International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management. Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, Oxfordshire UK. ISSN 2151-3732; e-ISSN 2151-3740

---

Beschikbaar in	Auteurs
VLIZ: Open access 388181 [ download pdf ]

---

Author keywords

ecosystem services; final ecosystem services; intermediate ecosystem services; regulating services; supporting services; terminology

---

Auteurs		Top
Lamothe, K.A., redacteur Sutherland, I.J.

---

Abstract

Some ecosystem services (ES) bestow society with obvious tangible benefits such as nourishment from food and water (i.e. final ES), whereas other ES benefit society through complex pathways such as maintaining the resilience of ecosystems and the final ES they provide (i.e. intermediate ES). However, the term ‘intermediate ES’ has remained loosely defined and some authors are now questioning the term’s applicability. To uncover the meaning and origin of the intermediate ES term, we reviewed the literature from 2000 to 2016. We found that the term originated in economics (early 2000s), shifted into ecology in the late 2000s, and its use has grown since. Intermediate ES have been commonly defined as indirect benefits, less commonly as types of ecological components, and occasionally as supporting and regulating ES. We explore these analogies, provide a timeline of the term’s use, and discuss pros and cons of the terminology. We recommend that intermediate ES should be defined in specific (often local) contexts considering social factors such as demand for ES and if the service is a key step along an identifiable pathway toward final ES delivery – considerations we illustrate using coastal temperate forests as a case study.

---

Alle informatie in het Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) valt onder het VLIZ Privacy beleid

Top | Auteurs