Over het archief
Het OWA, het open archief van het Waterbouwkundig Laboratorium heeft tot doel alle vrij toegankelijke onderzoeksresultaten van dit instituut in digitale vorm aan te bieden. Op die manier wil het de zichtbaarheid, verspreiding en gebruik van deze onderzoeksresultaten, alsook de wetenschappelijke communicatie maximaal bevorderen.
Dit archief wordt uitgebouwd en beheerd volgens de principes van de Open Access Movement, en het daaruit ontstane Open Archives Initiative.
Basisinformatie over ‘Open Access to scholarly information'.
| one publication added to basket [209135] |
Review of the effects of protection in marine protected areas: current knowledge and gaps
Ojeda-Martínez, C.; Bayle-Sempere, J.T.; Sánchez Jerez, P.; Salas, F.; Stobart, B.; Goñi, R.; Falcón, J.M.; Graziano, M.; Guala, I.; Higgins, R.; Vandeperre, F.; Le Diréach, L.; Martín-Sosa, P.; Vaselli, S. (2011). Review of the effects of protection in marine protected areas: current knowledge and gaps. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 34(1): 191-203
In: Animal Biodiversity and Conservation. Museu de Zoologia de Barcelona: Barcelona. ISSN 1578-665X; e-ISSN 2014-928X, meer
|   |
| Trefwoord |
|
| Author keywords |
Marine conservation; Management; Assessment; Descriptors; Subject of study; Marine protected areas |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Ojeda-Martínez, C.
- Bayle-Sempere, J.T.
- Sánchez Jerez, P.
- Salas, F.
- Stobart, B.
|
- Goñi, R.
- Falcón, J.M.
- Graziano, M.
- Guala, I.
- Higgins, R.
|
- Vandeperre, F., meer
- Le Diréach, L.
- Martín-Sosa, P.
- Vaselli, S., meer
|
| Abstract |
The effectiveness of marine protected areas (MPAs) and the conservation of marine environments must be based on reliable information on the quality of the marine environment that can be obtained in a reasonable timeframe. We reviewed studies that evaluated all aspects related to the effectiveness of MPAs in order to describe how the studies were conducted and to detect fields in which research is lacking. Existing parameters used to evaluate the effectiveness of MPAs are summarised. Two–hundred and twenty–two publications were reviewed. We identified the most commonly used study subjects and methodological approaches. Most of the studies concentrated on biological parameters. Peer reviewed studies were based on control vs. impact design. BACI and mBACI designs were used in very few studies. Through this review, we have identified gaps in the objectives assigned to MPAs and the way in which they have been evaluated. We suggest some guidelines aimed at improving the assessment of the effects of protection in MPAs. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
