Over het archief
Het OWA, het open archief van het Waterbouwkundig Laboratorium heeft tot doel alle vrij toegankelijke onderzoeksresultaten van dit instituut in digitale vorm aan te bieden. Op die manier wil het de zichtbaarheid, verspreiding en gebruik van deze onderzoeksresultaten, alsook de wetenschappelijke communicatie maximaal bevorderen.
Dit archief wordt uitgebouwd en beheerd volgens de principes van de Open Access Movement, en het daaruit ontstane Open Archives Initiative.
Basisinformatie over ‘Open Access to scholarly information'.
one publication added to basket [323133] |
Sea state trends and variability: consistency between models, altimeters, buoys, and seismic data (1979-2016)
Stopa, J.E.; Ardhuin, F.; Stutzmann, E.; Lecocq, T. (2019). Sea state trends and variability: consistency between models, altimeters, buoys, and seismic data (1979-2016). JGR: Oceans 124(6): 3923-3940. https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014607
In: Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans. AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION: Washington. ISSN 2169-9275; e-ISSN 2169-9291, meer
| |
Trefwoord |
|
Author keywords |
wave hindcasting; COWCLIP; seismic noise; long-term trends; ClimateForecast System Reanalysis; data homogeneity |
Auteurs | | Top |
- Stopa, J.E.
- Ardhuin, F.
- Stutzmann, E.
- Lecocq, T., meer
|
|
|
Abstract |
Wave hindcasts of long time series (>30years) have been instrumental in understanding the wave climate. However, it is still difficult to have a consistent reanalysis suitable for study of trends and interannual variability. Here we explore the consistency of a wave hindcast with independent observations from moored buoys, satellite altimeters, and seismic data. We use the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) winds to drive a wave model since extreme events are generally well captured. Unfortunately, the original CFSR winds are not homogeneous in time. We systematically modify this wind field in time and space to produce a wave field that has homogeneous differences against the Globwave/SeaStateCCI altimeter wave height database. These corrections to the winds and resulting waves are validated using independent buoy and microseism data. We particularly use seismic data in the dominant double-frequency band, around 5-s period, that are generated by opposing waves of equal frequencies. The seismic data confirms that our correction of time-varying biases is consistent, even in remote and undersampled region such as the Southern Ocean where the original CFSR biases are strongest. Our analysis is performed on monthly time series, and we expect the monthly statistics to be better suited for climate studies. Remaining issues with time consistency of reanalysis products and associated wave hindcasts are further discussed. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.