Over het archief
Het OWA, het open archief van het Waterbouwkundig Laboratorium heeft tot doel alle vrij toegankelijke onderzoeksresultaten van dit instituut in digitale vorm aan te bieden. Op die manier wil het de zichtbaarheid, verspreiding en gebruik van deze onderzoeksresultaten, alsook de wetenschappelijke communicatie maximaal bevorderen.
Dit archief wordt uitgebouwd en beheerd volgens de principes van de Open Access Movement, en het daaruit ontstane Open Archives Initiative.
Basisinformatie over ‘Open Access to scholarly information'.
| one publication added to basket [362537] |
Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach
Harrison, P.A.; Dunford, R.; Barton, D.N.; Kelemen, E.; Martín-López, B.; Norton, L.; Termansen, M.; Saarikoski, H.; Hendriks, K.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Czúcz, B.; García-Llorente, M.; Howard, D.; Jacobs, S.; Karlsen, M.; Kopperoinen, L.; Madsen, A.; Rusch, G.; Van Eupen, M.; Verweij, P.; Smith, R.; Tuomasjukka, D.; Zulian, G. (2018). Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach. Ecosystem Services 29(Part C): 481-498. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.016
In: Ecosystem Services. Elsevier: Amsterdam. ISSN 2212-0416, meer
|  |
| Auteurs | | Top |
- Harrison, P.A.
- Dunford, R.
- Barton, D.N.
- Kelemen, E.
- Martín-López, B.
- Norton, L.
- Termansen, M.
- Saarikoski, H.
|
- Hendriks, K.
- Gómez-Baggethun, E.
- Czúcz, B.
- García-Llorente, M.
- Howard, D.
- Jacobs, S., meer
- Karlsen, M.
- Kopperoinen, L.
|
- Madsen, A.
- Rusch, G.
- Van Eupen, M.
- Verweij, P.
- Smith, R.
- Tuomasjukka, D.
- Zulian, G.
|
| Abstract |
A range of methods are available for assessing ecosystem services. Methods differ in their aims; from mapping and modelling the supply and demand of ecosystem services to appraising their economic and non-economic importance through valuation techniques. Comprehensive guidance for the selection of appropriate ecosystem service assessment methods that address the requirements of different decision-making contexts is lacking. This paper tackles this gap using the experience from 27 case studies which applied different biophysical, socio-cultural and monetary valuation methods to operationalise the ecosystem service concept towards sustainable land, water and urban management. A survey of the reasons why the case study teams selected particular methods revealed that stakeholder-oriented reasons, such as stakeholder participation, inclusion of local knowledge and ease of communication, and decision-oriented reasons, such as the purpose of the case study and the ecosystem services at stake, were key considerations in selecting a method. Pragmatic reasons such as available data, resources and expertise were also important factors. This information was used to develop a set of linked decision trees, which aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners in choosing ecosystem service assessment methods that are suitable for their context. |
IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.
