Open WL Archief (OWA)

Over het archief

Het OWA, het open archief van het Waterbouwkundig Laboratorium heeft tot doel alle vrij toegankelijke onderzoeksresultaten van dit instituut in digitale vorm aan te bieden. Op die manier wil het de zichtbaarheid, verspreiding en gebruik van deze onderzoeksresultaten, alsook de wetenschappelijke communicatie maximaal bevorderen.

Dit archief wordt uitgebouwd en beheerd volgens de principes van de Open Access Movement, en het daaruit ontstane Open Archives Initiative.

Basisinformatie over ‘Open Access to scholarly information'.

[ meld een fout in dit record ]

mandje (1): toevoegen | toon

---

one publication added to basket [362538]

When we cannot have it all: ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning Turkelboom, F.; Leone, M.; Jacobs, S.; Kelemen, E.; García-Llorente, M.; Baró, F.; Termansen, M.; Barton, D.N.; Berry, P.; Stange, E.; Thoonen, M.; Kalóczkai, A.; Vadineanu, A.; Castro, A.J.; Czúcz, B.; Röckmann, C.; Wurbs, D.; Odee, D.; Preda, E.; Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Rusch, G.M.; Pastur, G.M.; Palomo, I.; Dick, J.; Casaer, J.; van Dijk, J.; Priess, J.A.; Langemeyer, J.; Mustajoki, J.; Kopperoinen, L.; Baptist, M.J.; Peri, P.L.; Mukhopadhyay, R.; Aszalós, R.; Roy, S.B.; Luque, S.; Rusch, V. (2018). When we cannot have it all: ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning. Ecosystem Services 29(Part C): 566-578. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.011 In: Ecosystem Services. Elsevier: Amsterdam. ISSN 2212-0416, meer

---

Beschikbaar in	Auteurs
VLIZ: Non-open access 388107 [ aanvragen ]

---

Auteurs		Top
Turkelboom, F., meer Leone, M. Jacobs, S., meer Kelemen, E. García-Llorente, M. Baró, F., meer Termansen, M. Barton, D.N. Berry, P. Stange, E. Thoonen, M., meer Kalóczkai, A. Vadineanu, A.	Castro, A.J. Czúcz, B. Röckmann, C. Wurbs, D. Odee, D. Preda, E. Gómez-Baggethun, E. Rusch, G.M. Pastur, G.M. Palomo, I. Dick, J. Casaer, J., meer	van Dijk, J. Priess, J.A. Langemeyer, J. Mustajoki, J. Kopperoinen, L. Baptist, M.J., meer Peri, P.L. Mukhopadhyay, R. Aszalós, R. Roy, S.B. Luque, S. Rusch, V.

---

Abstract

Spatial planning has to deal with trade-offs between various stakeholders’ wishes and needs as part of planning and management of landscapes, natural resources and/or biodiversity. To make ecosystem services (ES) trade-off research more relevant for spatial planning, we propose an analytical framework, which puts stakeholders, their land-use/management choices, their impact on ES and responses at the centre. Based on 24 cases from around the world, we used this framing to analyse the appearance and diversity of real-world ES trade-offs. They cover a wide range of trade-offs related to ecosystem use, including: land-use change, management regimes, technical versus nature-based solutions, natural resource use, and management of species. The ES trade-offs studied featured a complexity that was far greater than what is often described in the ES literature. Influential users and context setters are at the core of the trade-off decision-making, but most of the impact is felt by non-influential users. Provisioning and cultural ES were the most targeted in the studied trade-offs, but regulating ES were the most impacted. Stakeholders’ characteristics, such as influence, impact faced, and concerns can partially explain their position and response in relation to trade-offs. Based on the research findings, we formulate recommendations for spatial planning.

---

Alle informatie in het Integrated Marine Information System (IMIS) valt onder het VLIZ Privacy beleid

Top | Auteurs

IMIS is ontwikkeld en wordt gehost door het VLIZ.